Readers should be aware that a complete black-out of data from the various government agencies (NASA, ESA, China, etc.) of Comet 3I/ATLAS continues, now going on two months:
The last feed was cut just as soon as one of the comet’s “companions” peeled off for Mars. We do not know if it crashed, “landed,” exploded, or was captured by Mars . . . or why. We do not know if it occurred merely because of gravitational attraction (unlikely), magnetic attraction (more likely), or “sent” as a probe (?!!!). Speculation abounds.
Of course, the general public has not had access to “real time” space data since the 1970s, a fact which James McCanney has complained and railed against as criminal since then. All space data is “managed” and any so-called “live” feeds from our spacecraft have already been reviewed and altered for public consumption:
What has kept these agencies in check – somewhat – are the many thousands of amateur and corporate astronomers worldwide. This fact has forced them to not stray too far from reality in forming a narrative. They risk being credibly contradicted by these independent observers.
Nevertheless, “live” feeds always seem to include just enough visual anomalies to excite the public imagination, which I surmise is intentional.
Why else would public figures be murdered in broad daylight in front of thousands of people and in front of a myriad of cell phone cameras?
It promotes chaos from competing conspiracy theories. . . And controlled chaos always benefits the state.
Currently, the Comet “Atlas” is behind the glare of the Sun and is expected to be for some weeks. Only satellites and Mars rover vehicles can see it. NASA blames their failure on the government shutdown. What is the ESA’s excuse?
If they are hiding something, what are they hiding?
The electrical nature of comets? Is it merely to save themselves embarrassment?
They have admitted that the primary composition of the cometary nucleus is nickel with a rare purity. As noted in a previous installment, NASA scientists have propounded the theory that it is debris from a stellar super nova, perhaps a neutron star, which would make it a magnetar. McCanney has argued this science for almost 50 years.
This fact could explain its unusually strong magnetic and electromagnetic attraction. As the comet encountered Mars, there should have been just such an attraction, perhaps the exchange of a Birkeland current. This kind of science belongs to the world of science fiction, which if ever validated, would vindicate past catastrophists such as Immanuel Velikovsky. . . and cannot be allowed to happen.
Its green/bluish hue has suggested the presence of hydrogen interacting with oxygen, contrary to the official narrative, that it is cyanide. This has been now confirmed by the admission of the presence of hydroxyls (water) in its coma. In the plasma discharge comet model (McCanney), these elements should be drawn in by the comet from its orbital environment, which means the comet has passed through such areas of the solar system saturated with these elements.
Yet, we are told that while the sunward spike is exceptionally intense – indicating voltage and heat from an ungrounded electrical current – yet there is no tail or only a faint one. These factors have contributed to the excitement of an ET narrative.
However, the absence of a tail can be explained by the comet’s exceptional velocity or that its passage along the ecliptic is void of elements which could be drawn in. If Mars has slowed its velocity (amateur astronomers will be able to calculate that based upon the time it takes to re-emerge from behind the Sun), then it is more likely to be “captured” by Jupiter or at least peel off more of the comet’s companions, just as Mars has done.
Are they afraid of something?
That is a question more relevant to this series. Does the comet pose a threat to Earth or the Sun? Is it a precursor to the approach of a much larger and more powerful object: the Black Star?
Pingback: November Update, 2025 – 2046 AD