Prophecy #93,from Merlin: High Priest of the Holy Grail, James Stivers, 2011
The winds shall fight together with a dreadful blast, and their Sound shall reach to the Stars.
The Nebular Cloud Theory of the Origin of the Solar System
Looking down from the North Pole, Earth spins in a counter-clockwise direction. It orbits the Sun in a counter-clockwise direction, as do all the planets of the solar system. The Sun’s rotation is also counter-clockwise.
This fact has suggested to scientists the nebular cloud theory – the standard theory – that the solar system began from a spinning cloud of gases which coalesced and from which all of the planets were spun-off. The planets share this same direction of rotation as their Mother Sun.
While an attractive explanation, this theory has been shown to be less than satisfactory because there is no known law in physics which explains how gases can become solids. Gases dissipate, they do not coalesce.
Nebular cloud theorists, of course, believe that a process of condensation occurs as the nebular cloud cools (deposition), much like our clouds in the sky condense to form rain or ice. But this only works in the presence of gravitational attraction, and gravitational attraction requires a solid with mass.
The answer to this problem has been the invention of plasma physics: a state of matter which is neither solid nor gas, yet which, supposedly, manifests the properties of both. Nebular theorists want us to believe that the Sun is a plasma which gives the apparition of a crust and a solid core.
With similar logic, electrical universe theorists argue that structure and mass in nebular clouds which create accretion occur because of electrical processes. Because of electrical currents, plasmas – sometimes called “the fourth state of matter” – seem to cause the transitions of matter between its various states: from gas to solid, from solid to gas, and so on. These electrical forces occur in both nuclear and chemical processes which create favorable conditions to translate energy to mass, just as they do from mass to energy. The pinch effect of Birkeland currents becomes a sophisticated replacement to the nebular process of cooling and condensation.
To do justice to Dr. Robitaille’s theory of liquid metallic hydrogen (LMH) – cited in our previous installment – he, too, forcefully argues against the nebular theory on the grounds that a solid is needed – or as he puts it, “condensed matter” – to create a process of accretion. He views liquid metallic hydrogen as “condensed matter” and although a liquid, still manifesting the same properties as matter in a solid state.
He has also argued that the fusion reaction of LMH also results in further tertiary chemical fires which create various layers of rigid lattice structures – an hexagonal grid – through which the Sun combusts. Scientists otherwise call this solar granulation, and suggest they are formed from the Sun’s magnetic fields. However, because the liquid hydrogen has metallic properties, Robitaille argues that it is responsible for the Sun’s electromagnetic field.
This “Hell’s Kitchen” – to borrow a term from Patten – creates the various elements of the periodic chart which accrete or are expelled into an outer and cooler crustal region of the corona, depending upon the locality and explosive force of the various storms in the Sun. In other words, the Sun is, as are all stars, the setting of an on-going, turbulent act of a creation.
Vogt’s Cosmology
But we need not know exactly how these processes work to understand what is happening now. An imperfect cosmology does not preclude our ability to achieve some accuracy in interpreting what is happening from current astronomical observations. This is partly from the fact that a given event can have more than one cause. It is the event itself which affects us.
Understanding the cause accurately, however, aids prescience. A change in my barometer may tell me, for example, that it will rain soon because a low pressure system is approaching, even though there may not be a cloud in the sky. The barometer reading gives me warning before the storm clouds gather.
Consequently, even though storm clouds will give me warning that rain is imminent, a change in barometric pressure would give me an extra day or two warning.
What I will be arguing in the next and final installment of this series is that the submarinal river canyons off the coasts of all the continents – submerged in the continental shelves – can have more than one cause. Douglas Vogt has argued that these canyons could have only been formed from a reversal in the Earth’s rotation on multiple occasions which forced an emptying of the oceanic basins to inundate the continental land masses. Such an obvious fact, he thinks, could have only one explanation – one which, unfortunately, defies the laws of physics. There is no known law of physics – no known force – which can overcome the inertia of the Earth’s rotation and then begin to spin it in the opposite direction. We discussed this in Part 1 of this series.
For this reason, he has resolved the problem with a different doctrine of metaphysics: the Theory of Multi-Dimensional Reality, sometimes called “the Informational Theory of Existence.” He believes the Universe is a giant computer he calls “the Diehold” and that matter is much like a multi-dimensional video card within this computer. This Diehold video card creates matter from “information,” which he defines as spectral lines of frequency waves which cross over – in and out – of physical existence through points of entry at an atomic level. He calls these points of entry “modulation points.” In short, the Universe is a hologram.
He believes that Earth has a modulation point at its center where “information” becomes matter which emanates from the core: first as plasma, then, as it cools, to form the various layers of the outer core, the mantle, and the crust. He believes that this emanation is proved by the existence of toroidal-shaped radio waves found in Earth’s atmosphere. These longitudinal waves are rotational which in time create the rotational spin of the Earth. It is important to understand his view that Earth’s rotation is caused by the movement of this electromagnetic field, not the other way around.
Vogt’s theory is supported by numerous factoids and inferences which offer convincing proof of his theory, but we are still a long way from reaching a new “law of physics,” since he has not sufficiently disproven other scientific explanations.
[Side Note #1: Although it is more of a philosophical question outside of our current scientific discussion, Vogt obviously embraces Plato’s noumenal view of the cosmos, as opposed to Aristotle’s particularism. In fact, Vogt does not believe that Aristotle ever existed, but rather represented a literary invention of “the Piso’s,” a Roman family which he blames for various historical frauds such as, the “matter theory of existence,” the invention of Rabbinic Judaism, historic Christianity, and other radical revisions of history. But more another time].
Earth’s Core: Molten or Solid?
A solid gyro precesses by moving its plane of spin. That is, in a solid gyro, the “North Pole” always remains in the same place on the spinning surface. It is not so on a liquid gyro. A liquid gyro precesses by the molecules moving so that the “North Pole” shifts to a different “place” within the liquid, and hence a different place on the thin external crust also.
The Earth is two gyros, one is solid one, the crust surrounding the liquid gyro. The liquid aspect dominates the solid one, 99:1. This means that not only does the tilt of the spin axis change relative to the ecliptic. The equator and the two flat spots on the crust with zero rotational velocity (the North and South Poles) also relocate.
Donald Patten, Mars-Earth Wars, Internet Edition, End Note #13
According to Donald Patten, Earth is two gyros – one a solid (the crust), the other is a liquid (Earth’s interior). Recent discoveries, however, tell us that below the Earth’s mantle of molten lava, there is an outer core and an inner core. The inner core appears to be a solid.
Vogt has embraced this new discovery as proof of the existence of the modulation point, which he predicted would be some 30 miles in diameter. Although the seismic readings show an inner core of an 800-mile diameter, it could be argued that our readings are skewed. The closer we get to the modulation point, the more likely our probing echoes would be deflected. In other words, they would produce the profile of a very dense solid, even though it is not a solid.
However, in the alternative, this discovery could simply be proof of a solid core. In this respect, McCanney’s view would be vindicated that Earth’s inner core is solid because it was originally a stellar remnant expelled by a star after a super nova:
From seismographic data of the Earth, it is well known that the density of Earth’s interior is quite constant, but has a small, very dense central core. This core is the original “planetary seed” of Earth which was the original comet nucleus.
James McCanney, Planet X et al, Ibid Pt. 2 p. 76
In McCanney’s Capture Theory of the Solar System (SP#18), Earth’s very dense “planetary seed” then became a comet in which it added lithospheric layers of cosmically charged – and very dense – dust particles. After acquiring sufficient mass to create gravitational attraction, its core would then have included the radioactive isotopes picked up during its many passages through the solar atmosphere – the zodiacal disk – as some sun-diving comets do today: a fact acknowledged by scientists going back to the time of Newton.
These isotopes experience radioactive decay and interact with the magnetic field of Earth’s core. These, combined with the continuous capture of solar radiation in the Van Allen Belts, generate heat in Earth’s outer core and the inner mantle. The outer core has a different viscosity than the mantle because its constituents have different melting temperatures.
With a solid, magnetic core, rather than a molten one, the differential rate of spin of the core within the molten or partially molten outer core (and to a varying degree, the mantle) can create electrical currents and heat. Volcanic lightning proves the existence of electrical charge in Earth’s magma, although it may not necessarily be the origin of that charge, especially if the magma is not composed of radioactive elements. The flow of electrical current creates resonance to form the F1 and F2 layers in the ionosphere and is cited by Vogt as proof of his theory.
As for the submarinal river canyons, the tidal forces of close planetary flybys – including the Moon in an eccentric orbit – can cause crustal tearing and heaving and mile-high tsunamis of continental scale. We think the next solar nova will produce just such lunar effects.
Again, while there are aspects of Vogt’s theory which have merit and offer a better understanding of the catastrophe we face, it falls short in that it has not disproven all other theories. Nevertheless, he may yet be proven right.
Earth as a Gyro
To help understand Earth’s rotational spin, McCanney has offered the analogy of the chicken egg: it has a thin crust (the shell), a liquid clear membrane (the egg white), and a yolk of a more rigid viscosity:
McCanney, Ibid., p. 78, FN. 13
On the subject of precession, crustal shifting, and migration of the poles of the spinning planetary mantle, it is informative to spin a hard boiled egg and then spin a fresh egg. The hard boiled egg will continue to spin at the initial rate, whereas the fresh egg will quickly reduce its rotational rate since the interior is not bound to the shell and remained almost stationary during the initial spin, although the shell could initially spin. Viscosity quickly brings the shell and fluid interior into an equilibrium rotational rate. The Earth is similar to the fresh egg. Its mantle may be moved considerably by an external torque, but it will quickly resume spinning at the original rate even though the original poles had migrated to a new location.
However, if Earth has a stellar “seed” at its core which is solid, then contrary to Patten’s claim of two gyros, the Earth would have three: the crust (a solid), the mantle (a liquid), and the core (another solid). It is possible that the outer core has a greater viscosity than the inner mantle region which participates in the flow of electrical current. But with an extremely dense inner core, Earth would now be three gyros.
Earth’s rotation has existed since time immemorial. All three gyros would now be spinning at the same rotational rate, as noted by McCanney above. However, should an outside source somehow interfere with that rotational spin, the different parts would experience the change at different rates. The crust could be stopped, or slowed, for example, while the molten mantle would continue at the same rate of spin.
Conversely, if the mantle were energized with greater heat, it would become less viscous and more fluid, and thus could speed up in its rotation.
As for the core, electromagnetic pulses could cause rotational “jerks” in the core which would create disparity in rates of spin. These “jerks” and change in the core’s rotational rate has made recent news.
The Shock Wave
The immediate impact of the blast from a solar nova should create a “reverse English” effect on the Earth: it will at first decrease the rate of Earth’s crustal spin, perhaps even stopping it outright. The planet will experience a ricochet effect or bounce, like when a spinning basketball hits the pavement. This impact should be expected to alter Earth’s orbit, making it more eccentric. Thus, initially, the differential shock of the impact will have the effect of slowing the Earth’s rotation, but because the blast wave will share in the Sun’s current counter-clockwise motion – and that of Earth’s interior – the sustained wave will create torque which will subsequently amplify and actually speed up Earth’s rotation. Like a lawn sprinkler, Earth would be caught-up in this stellar spiral and resume its current counter-clockwise direction with an increased rate of rotation.
[Side Note #2: Vogt’s model also argues that the Earth’s rotation will stop and then reverse. A stop in the Earth’s rotation is all that is needed to empty the oceanic basins.]
You might compare this to the experience of disengaging the clutch of a car and coasting down hill. As you roll down the hill, the car will increase in speed as there is no “drag” from the idling engine. But if you engage the clutch, it will temporarily have a braking effect. If you again press on the accelerator, the car will speed up because a new sustained force from the engine is now engaged.
The Moon also orbits Earth in a counter-clockwise direction. The Moon’s tidal effects reinforce Earth’s current direction of rotation. It has a synodal orbit of 29.530 days and a sidereal orbit of 27.322 days. We think that if the nova matches lunation at the Moon’s apogee, there will be approximately two days in which the possibility exists that it can be blown out of Earth’s region of control and be lost in space. If the nova occurs during the lunation at its perigee, there will be two days in which it can be blown into a collision course with Earth.*
Obviously, with the second scenario, should the Moon approach the Roche limit, it would be shattered into pieces, rather than actually colliding with Earth. However, the remnants of the Moon would be recaptured by Earth’s gravity and form an asteroidal belt around the Earth. In such a scenario, the tidal effects will be diminished or amplified, depending upon whether the lunar pieces are clustered together and how close a permanent orbit should occur.
[Side Note #3: A scenario can be envisioned, if the Moon has a large enough chunk to have gravitational attraction, that the the Moon will re-aggregate in Earth’s orbit over a period of perhaps thousands of years.]
Other than these four days, the Moon will be forced into an eccentric orbit which will bring it closer to Earth at certain times and farther away at others. The tidal effects will be catastrophic and will affect Earth for centuries, perhaps for thousands of years. This will be discussed, at length, in the next and last installment of this series.
What kind of force would be necessary to cause these changes in rotation and orbital periods?
E/C2=M: From Energy to Mass
The Yarkovsky effect is a force acting on a rotating body in space caused by the anisotropic emission of thermal photons, which carry momentum. It is usually considered in relation to meteoroids or small asteroids (about 10 cm to 10 km in diameter), as its influence is most significant for these bodies.
Wikipedia source, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarkovsky_effect
Imagining for a moment that a true nova of the Sun would expel most of its solar atmosphere into space – with the greater force at its equator where the zodiacal disc exists (the region which contains the greater concentration of heavy isotopes, dust particles and perhaps larger debris held in orbit by the Sun’s gravity, and which happens to match the plane of the ecliptic) – a 5-million mile wall of force would be directed at Earth to the speed of 1500 miles per second. It will arrive in about 8 hours.
Velocity will create percussion, just as what a suicide victim experiences when he hits the water from jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge. In the math of physics, if Energy divided by the Speed of Light (C) squared equals Mass (E/c2=M), assuming that the blast wave has no solids (which is not true but cannot be measured with any certainty), the force would be the equivalence of a solid body 172,980 miles thick. Earth is 7,917 miles thick.
But the wave will be traversing an ever larger circle in space, such that by the time it reaches Earth some 96 million miles away, we must reduce it by the inverse square law – a factor of at least 9 in this case – to arrive at a blast wave with the force of a solid 19,220 miles thick. This is still by far greater than the mass of the Moon with a diameter of a mere 2,159 miles. It should blow it to pieces; except that since the Moon is a solid in space, it will not disintegrate, but rather ricochet into a new eccentric orbit. How much? Computers are probably necessary for such a calculation.
Likewise with Earth, the impact of the shock wave should be far greater than what is needed to cause the initial cessation of rotation in the crust. In this scenario, all of the geophysical disasters described by Vogt, Davidson, and others, will still come true.
A physical pole shift is probable, but by how much, it cannot be known. The momentum of the core and mantle will reassert itself. We don’t know how much of the Earth’s internal mass needs to be redistributed. Vogt, Davidson, and others assume that they have accurate calculations that are based upon past nova events. But as I have shown in past issues of Survival Praxis, causes of novae vary and because of that, their severity vary, as well.
Only if Earth has internal structural deformations which require a redistribution of mass, or if the Moon is forced into a new parabolic orbit would there be sufficient tidal force to move the crust. We think that it has happened before with Earth encounters with planetary-sized celestial objects such as the planet Mars (Patten) or Venus (Velikovsky/McCanney). A nova blast in itself still does not seem to be enough to produce a 90 degree or even 45 degree shift.
However, the effect of a new lunar orbit which is partially parabolic combined with the blast wave just might. . .
to be continued
* More forthcoming on lunation in the next installment.
James Wesley Stivers, 5/20/23
Survival Praxis is published twice a month only to the 2046AD.org website.
Copyright (c) reserved 2020-2023.
Pingback: Updates for June, 2023 – 2046 AD